Some thoughts on treescapes of the future
Calling for a decolonisation of the climate change agenda, Sultana (2022), writes “I want to interlace with the fleshiness of climate, the pasts and presents in our bodies, minds, soils, kin – where the theory is in the flesh.” When I try to write about treescapes 200 years from now, I think about how ((more than) human?) imaginaries might shift as much as material realities. I know that trees have memories, relational networks and complex systems of communication, but I only know this in an abstract way. I desire to know about trees from the inside (Ingold, 2013), with all their fleshy and lived reality. Might this be part of the future of treescapes? Sultana (2022) also draws on Tuck and Ree’s (2013) beautiful writing on ‘A Glossary of Haunting’. Tuck and Ree take up and rework Deleuze’s notion of desire as a counter to damage-centred narratives about communities, writing “Desire is what we know about ourselves, and damage is what is ...